ERA Landmarks India Ltd - Era Redwood residency fbd, join the group blog (ID # 2928)
Complaint by
aashkaul on May 18, 2010, 12:34 pm in Real Estate
Its been four years since we booked apartments in the project, Redwood Residency sector-78, faridabad. since its pre-launch there have been problems in the way ERa landmarks has handled this project. please remember this was a sold out project so there was no problem of funds getting generated for Era. It\'s original site where construction was to happen was sector-88, from there they shifted the project to sector-76 and later to sector-78. With nobody\'s consent. Era pressumed that since it ... read more
I support this complaint.
maina@yahoo.com
want to sell my flat immediately @ 1100/sqft plus additional charges viz parking, plc, etc as per era.
Hello Nitin , Dheeraj, Jadab and others...pls join us in our endevour...its time...mail me your numbers so that we can touch base and understand that what are the issues that have risen now...my mail id is aashkaul@gmail.com or you can join the group i have already posted the link of it on the page on this forum.
I would like to sell my flat at tower B @ 1100/- per sqft. interested parties please contact through this foram.
I support this complaint. We should file a case againt them. lets come togather n su them.
I support this complaint. The flats are available for Rs. 1100/sqft at resale. A case is supposed to be filed
I support this complaint. Also is it possible to talk to any of the bank who are / has offered loans for flats. I mean they might have all the original layout, plans, permissions etc before they tie up with ERA, so that they can give further loans.
Any ideas?
I support this complaint.
I support this complaint.
I support this complaint.
I have visited the site last week, and have found out following -
1. Land that Era claims that they have acquired for proposed Central Park is still not owned by ERA. It is owned by Farmer, and is not willing to sell it.
2. Club house is moved to some other location from its prior location, which was mentioned in their earlier plan and is included in the Agreement. Now club house is planned to be built behind Tower D, but there is no enough space to accomodate the size of club house which was committed to us
3. Construction of Tower I has started in place of Club House. There was no such communication from ERA to all members.
4. As per HUDA plan, there is a planned 24Mtr wide road which will pass through the Redwood Residency plot, in front of E,F,G,H and also in from of Tower I, which will divide the plot into 3 parts,and there is no proper plan for Boundary, entrance gate and security from ERA.
Since there is no proper central park and club house (which was confirmed in the agreement we signed), why should we pay the park facing PLC and club charges.
I proposes that We should ask for explaination for all these points from ERA in writting, and ask for compensation. Also, ERA should share the copy of the most recent approved project plan from HUDA.
I support this complaint. Era is ignoring its customers and is non-transparent in its dealings.
I support this complaint.
I support this complaint. This is exactly how it happened, and when I called Era\'s office yesterday, they told me that they have the possession of the land now. But they can not share any documents regarding this as it s against company policy. How can you believe them, when they can not even share such vital info.
why don\'t we all go to thier office and force them to show proofs.
An email communication has been sent to ERA Landmarks India Ltd on May 18, 2010, 12:34 pm
Era landmarks limited , god save the innocent people from these type of companies , who devise legal and illegal ways and means to cheat and dupe their customers of their hard earned money.